if you consider an ideal scenario where gpu and asics are both easy to get, and if productor dont use them before selling, and if they are cheaper of course i prefer asic…but it is not the real world… that is the problem… as an asset, there is no comparison, but there are some another actors to have in consideration… economics, geograpic, ideological…
“in the point of why a group should decide…”…I never said that a exclusive group should decide this issues… what is more, if there is something that distintic ETC from other cryptocommunitys, it is the community sense, the help of massive small and individual hands to the green project, the ideological background of ETC ¿code is the law?,the aportations of all of us… so i just believe that ETC comunity, user, holders, miners…should decide about etc future…using the democratic way of vote, one person = one vote… because, what is ETC if it is not the people that compose it??? remember… WE ARE DEMOCRATIC…DECENTRALICED…
and finally, yes, i had suspected that there were runing asics on the net… but if we give hem a green light let see how much the diff will increase… cause they will produce much more of them… huge more of them…
i say that in the actual scenario, the ASIC is not popular (i mena, accesible for mayority) option, if they were in a idealistic world, okay, perfect, ASICS FOR ALL, but it is not like that in this running days…so i say NO to hem… cause i wanna protect the inmutable one net from centralization…
the past is not the present, but it is a good to learn that one must walk with “iron foots” … if you cut your hand today, tomorrow you will not climb a tree…if asics come massibely, gpus will get obsolet…